Monday, 31 March 2014

>>>Thursday April 10th at 10:15am in the Gym: Pin up

All students are requested to present material (i.e. models and drawings) developed in response to the [P4] assignment´s [S] scale requirements:
[S] 1:20 and/or 1:10 and/or 1:1 / detail(-s)
The objective is to explore and develop material qualities in one or more critically selected relation(-s) between the existing structure and the proposed transformative intervention. The selection criteria should be based on the materials ability to document proposed materialization(-s) of paramount interest to the chosen act of intervention.
Hand-in of material 8-9am.

Please note info-meeting on assessment in the Grand Auditorium 9-10am.

Thursday, 27 March 2014

 >>>programme sheet: hand in March 31st before 12 noon in the studio

Please note that
·         the compulsory format is: one folded A3 sheet, potentially printed on both sides
·         a formatting of the running text  which promotes legibility is required. For example: If utilizing Verdana; Helvetica; Arial or similar sans serif font 8pt min. is required.
·         the items in the list below should structure the subject matter of the information communicated by your program sheet. Responding to this requirement, you may structure your communication of the required information in whichever way you find serves the best interest of your project
·         you may integrate text and photos/drawings in whichever way serves the best interest of communicating the particular subject matter at hand
·         2 printed and folded copies of your program must be handed in before noon Monday March 31st
List of required contents
1.       name of the unit + semester (Unit 2+3d – AL! A Laboratory S14)
2.       name of student + semester (for example: Karl Johan Svamp, 6. sem.)
3.       student number
4.       project title
5.       XL: Short presentation/analysis of the existing physical context ( PRORA incl. local environment) outlining particular relational aspects of interest to your project development.
6.       choice of
art form
act of transformation
L:  Choice of site for performance of transformational intervention outlining particular relational aspects of interest to – i.e. governing - your project development.
7.       M: An outline of particular relational aspects of interest to – i.e. governing - the concretization of your transformational intervention.
8.       S: An outline of particular relational aspects of interest to – i.e. governing - the materialization of your transformational intervention.
9.       a short and precise specification of the relationship between your project development/production and that of your team mate.
For your general information your program sheet will be forwarded to your external censor ahead of the final review.

>>> program sheet: short info meeting March 27th at 10am in the studio

Saturday, 22 March 2014

>>>Schedule midterm reviews March 24th-26th in the Gym

Please note that
>all presentations/discussions should be performed in English
>all teams should organize mutual note-taking between themselves ahead of presentation
>1 hour is set aside for each team (i.e. presentation(-s) + discussion = 1 hour max.)
>2 projectors will be available, but you have to provide a PC yourselves
>all material incl. digital should be ready for presentation 10 min. ahead of schedule
>schedule may be subject to ad hoc changes due to sudden illness etc. 
Mon 24.03. Students (semester) Guest critic
8-10am Hand in + mount of material
10am Marius Makos (4.) & Frederik R. Langhoff (4.)  SCW Thomas W. Lee
11am Adam Chr. Bundegaard (6.) & Jannik Kjær Nisgaard (6.) SCW
12noon-1pm Julie Bertelsen (6.) & Morten Bilde Hougaard (6.) TiN
Lunch break + demount/mount of material
2pm Morten Foller Larsen (4.) & Goda Juskeviciute (G) TiN Thomas W. Lee
3pm Asger L. Jespersen (4.) + Niklavs Krievs (G) IW
4pm Liv Skovgaard (6.) & Thea D. Orderud (6.) IW
Tue 25.03.
9am Mads Frølund Poulsen (4.) & Esther J. R. Eriksen (4.) TiN Charlotte Bundgaard
10am Malene Husum (4.) & Eva Hjortlund Nielsen (4.) TiN
11am Max Blume (G) & Claudia M. del Rio (G) IW
Lunch break + demount/mount of material
1pm Louise Sevelsted Viborg (6.) & Viktor L. Engels (6.) IW Claudia Carbone
2pm Lasse N. Rasmussen (4.) & Erik Chr. Martiny (4.)  SCW
3pm Christopher S. Fischlein (6.) & Mathias Skafte A. (6.) SCW 2nd year: Lecture
4pm Michael Wolsing (6.) & Mette Christensen (6.) TiN
Wed 26.03.
9am Anette Vintervold (6.) & Malin Mohr (6.) TiN Annette Svaneklink J.
10am Mathias Højfeldt Nielsen (6.) & Anders Precht (6.) TiN
11am Unit master lecture
Lunch break + demount/mount of material
1pm Kristoffer Codam (6.) & Eirin Bakken (6.) IW Stine Henckel Schultz 
2pm Frederik Pilgaard Jensen (6.) & Amalie O. Kryger (4.) IW
3pm Iben Hjøllund (6.) & Anna Katrine Tan Nielsen (5.) IW

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

>>>Midterm reviews in the Gym

Mon. March 24th
8-10am: Hand in of all project material
10am-approx. 5pm: Presentations/discussions. Guest critic Thomas W. Lee
Tue. March 25th
9am-approx. 12noon: Presentations/discussions. Guest critic Charlotte Bundgaard
1-approx. 5pm: Presentations/discussions. Guest critic Claudia Carbone
3pm: Lecture, 2nd year students
Wed. March 26th
9-approx. 11am: Presentations/discussions. Guest critic Annette Svaneklink Jakobsen
11am: Unit master lecture
1-approx. 4pm: Presentations/discussions. Guest critic Stine Henckel Schultz

nb: all presentations are to include an introduction of
>chosen site within PRORA and a specification of contextual elements of particular interest to your further project development 
>chosen act of transformation
>chosen art form
>additional relational program development as of your date of presentation
>plans for further project development (foci) outlining material expected to be produced prior to final hand in.

Friday, 14 March 2014

>>>Tue March 18th at 12-2pm: Pin up in the studio based on blogs

Introducing their initial programs 3 teams - or potentially students working independently - will be asked to present the current status of their project development. Additionally to present their plans for midterm review presentation keeping in mind that the midterm review should be utilized as a means of framing a discussion that is of paramount value to their further project development.
The pin up being based on blogs, please note that potential supplementary material (drawings; models etc.) should be organised for presentation before the start of the pin up (a projector and a PC will be provided).